Thursday, June 16 at 04:52 AM:
i2 from here wrote:
"10 States with Pending Legislation to Legalize Medical Marijuana (as of May 13, 2011), visit - http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php? resourceID=002481 "

Saturday, June 11, 2011 at 04:50 PM:
i from here wrote:
"Info on Rallying at the Capitol Steps, see - http://www.leg.state.or.us/capinfo/lac_policies.pdf "

Pete Guither at DrugWarRant ( http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/ ) has started a 2006 voting guide and seeks our assistance in building a database. A lot has happened since the last election cycle and our momentum is building exponentially. With the FDA winning the prohibitionist "foot-in-mouth" award and Mark Souder the "golden idiot" trophy there are many prohibitionists with targets and plenty of ammo to shoot them down. The full text of Pete's post is here: http://blogs.salon.com/0002762/2006/06/19.html#a1624

Help us create a 2006 Drug Policy Voting Guide

Here's a great opportunity for everyone who reads this to get involved and make a contribution (without spending any money).

Back in 2004, I worked on a voting guide based on drug policy issues and managed to complete guides for 19 states, but I ran out of time to collect the information for the rest. Yet even those 19 state guides seemed to reach a lot of people, based on the email I got (and the large number of google-related visits).

This year, I've put together a voting guide framework using a wiki (a website structure that allows any registered user to make changes and add information, similar to Wikipedia).

The easy address to get there is http://voting.drugwarrant.com

How it works

Register for a free account (you don't have to use your real name, but you do have to use an actual email address of some kind in order to complete your registration -- to prevent spammers). Then, when you're logged in, simply go to the state page you want to change, click on "edit," type your information, click on "save." That's all there is to it!

Saturday, March 11 at 11:54 PM:
Dave M from Hillsboro, Or wrote:
" I am a registered OMMP patient. I am also fortunate to be an employed oregonian. Problem is this. In order to retain my job i am forced to forgo using my medicine. According to my employer, the EEOC and the State Employment department there are no protections for medical marijuana patients. As it has been explained to me, if I were to be terminated from my job for failing a urinalysis, I would also be unable to qualify for unemployment benefits. Maybe i am a bit naieve, but this just seems wrong to me. Is there any upcomming legislaton that may deal with these issues. Fredom from prosecution is great, but what good is it without freedom from Persecution. Discrimination is illegal unless you are a medical marijuana patient, then its OK !! This is Just Wrong!!

Thank you "

Sunday, July 17, 2005 at 08:04 PM:
Marjx from Here, Ore., USA wrote:
"There issues that have been addressed from children serv. to this. Where do we stand on these issue. Every is for dollar $. so are our children. See ASFA. Do we have address? Let me help. I'm just a good ole cult..old fashion granda; how does that fit into LAW in a juvenile custody isssue, they will use that.OR. mmp?) He's been grampa for 3.5 yrs or 4."